Location

G2, Naveen Residency, Hemanagar Road Number :9,Boduppal, Secunderabad, Telangana 500039 ,Country, INDIA

Sunday, June 26, 2022

Limited Atonement - Scripture Proofs:

Limited Atonement - Scripture Proofs:


1. Primary references. 

    a. Matthew 1:21. And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. 

Notice here the emphasis on "his people." They are the ones Jesus saves and no others. Whoever they may be (and the Scriptures teach us in other places that they are the elect), they are a limited and particular number of persons. But notice also the emphasis on the fact that He does save them. He does not merely make salvation available but saves them from their sins entirely. Most important of all is the fact that these are the reasons why He is called JESUS. To deny either of these things is to deny His very name and the meaning of His name. 

    b. Isaiah 53:11. He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities. 

    c. Matthew 20:28. Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many. 

    d. Matthew 26:28. For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sin. 

    e. Hebrews 9:28. So Christ was once offered to bear the sin of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation. 

All four of these texts show that Christ gave His life for a select and limited number of persons and not for every single person. This is not to deny that there are also passages which speak of "all" or of the "world"; but if the Bible is indeed the infallible Word of God, then the two types of passages cannot contradict each other, and either it must be shown that "many" somehow does mean "every single person," or it must be shown that "all" and "world" do not necessarily refer to every single person living or who has lived. Isaiah 53:11 and Matthew 26:28 also use this language. 

It might be noted here, too, that the Scriptures speak of this "many" for whom Christ gave His life in connection with the fact that that gift of His life was a satisfaction and justification for those for whom He died, a ransom that actually purchases them out of the slavery of sin and death, and that it actually remits sin, i.e., sends it away. 

    f. John 6:37-39. All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. 

This passage also says that Christ actually loses none of those for whom He does His work. It is not as though Christ comes for all and yet loses many who slip away or do not believe. If He had lost even one of those for whom He came, He would not have done the Father's will, and His work would not even have been approved of God. This, by the way, also shows that it was not even God's will that Christ should die for or make salvation possible for all men. 

Here again the ones for whom He comes and does His work are those given Him by the Father, that is, the elect, those chosen by God before the foundations of the world. 

This passage is also valuable because it gives clear guidance as to how the word "all" is used in the Scriptures. We must not forget that it is not only used here but further defined as "all whom the Father giveth me." The "all" for whom Christ died, as this passage shows so clearly, never includes anyone but "all" the elect. 

    g. John 10:14, 15. I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. 

This passage not only teaches limited atonement by its emphasis on the sheep as the ones for whom Christ died, but it teaches very plainly what we have previously called "particular" atonement in that it tells us that Christ knows His sheep in the same way that the Father knows Him and He knows the Father, i.e., personally and by name. If this is true and if He laid down His life for those whom He knows personally, then He cannot have died merely so that anyone and everyone might have a chance at salvation. 

    h. John 10:26-28. But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. 

That He actually saves His sheep by His death, saves them all the way to heavenly glory, infallibly and completely, is taught in the verses quoted. These verses show that it is not our faith that determines whether we will profit from Christ's death, but the will of God. In other words, as Jesus tells the unbelieving Jews, it is not that they are not part of the sheep who profit from His death because they do not believe; but because they are not of His sheep, they do not believe, i.e., because He did not die for them, they do not receive the gift of faith which He purchases for us with His own blood nor any of the other blessings of salvation. 

    i. Acts 20:28. Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. 

This passage identifies once again those for whom the blood of Christ was shed as a limited and particular number of persons, in this case, the church. And when we remember that very often in the Scriptures the church is contrasted with the world as a group drawn and called out of it, this makes the text even more emphatic. 

    j. Isaiah 53:8. He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. 

    k. Luke 1:68. Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people. 

Here are two more passages that define those for whom Christ gave His life as "His people" or even "My people" (God Himself speaking). Surely the wicked and unbelieving cannot be called that! 

    l. Titus 2:13, 14. Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ; who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of all good works. 

   m. Galatians 3:13. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is everyone that hangeth on a tree. 

These last passages define those who benefit from Christ's redemptive work as "us," and the word used is by its very nature exclusive rather than inclusive. 

Titus 2:13, 14 is especially significant because it not only speaks of Christ giving Himself for us but shows that those for whom He gave Himself are surely and completely saved - redeemed, purified, and zealous of good works. 

2. Passages which show that Christ's death actually and fully saves those for whom He died. 

Many of the passages quoted above demonstrate clearly that Christ's death does not make salvation just a possibility, so that it depends on our accepting it to become efficacious but that it is salvation and the guarantee of eternal life for all those for whom He died. Since this is the real issue, however, in the debate over limited atonement, we add these passages to those previously quoted. 

    a. Luke 19:10. For the Son of Man is come to seek and to save that which was lost. 

Notice here that Christ comes to save the lost, not just to make it possible for them to be saved, the lost being those who know themselves lost like Zacchaeus. What is especially important about this verse, though, is that it is an explanation ("For ...") of the previous verse. There Jesus says, "This day is salvation come to this house." Salvation came, therefore, to the house of Zacchaeus not because he believed but because the Son of Man comes to save. 

    b. Romans 5:8-10. But God commended therewith his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him. For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life. 

The point cannot be made anymore clearly than this verse makes it. We are reconciled to God by the death of Christ. That means that there is nothing anymore that is between God and us, nor can anything come between us, for having been reconciled, we shall be saved. This reference to salvation is more a reference to the final glory of God's people than to their first partaking of it, but that in no wise lessens the emphasis of the text. If anything, it makes the text even stronger, for then we have here a guarantee not only of the beginning of salvation but of eternal life itself and of heavenly glory. What is more, the passage is repeating and re-emphasizing that point, for it has already stated that we are justified by His blood (and therefore have peace with God (v. 1), and being justified shall surely be saved from wrath. The line of thought therefore is this: (1) Christ's death justifies; (2) because it justifies, it surely saves us from God's wrath; (3) therefore, there is no possibility of condemnation for anyone for whom Christ died but rather the assurance of life everlasting. 

    c I Peter 2:24. Who his ownself bore our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. 

This passage also teaches that not only Christ's death, but also all His suffering (his stripes) have actual saving power. It is to us the death of sin and the beginning of a new life of righteousness as well as our healing. And not only is it not merely the possibility of healing, but by it we were (literally, "have been") healed.

THE ONLY TIME WHEN GOD RAN!

Do you know the only time when GOD ran..?     

But when he was yet a great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion his father "ran" to meet him: We do not read of the "prodigal" running as he set out to return to his "father." All that is said of him is that "he arose, and came to his father." But of the "father" it is said that he "RAN"! [Luke 15:20]

Do you know dear reader, that this is the ONLY VERSE IN ALL THE BIBLE which represents God has being in a hurry! In the restoration of the ruined earth He acted orderly, we might say leisurely. In everything else but this, God is viewed as acting with calmness and deliberation, as befits One who has all eternity at His disposal. 

But here is what we term the IMPATIENCE OF DIVINE LOVE! [A.W. Pink]

It is with tears I say, that I do not deserve such a great and loving Father! And it will take more than an Eternity to understand this Love of God which passeth all knowledge and understanding! Hallelujah!

THE MEANING OF "KOSMOS" IN JOHN 3:16

 THE MEANING OF "KOSMOS" IN JOHN 3:16

A.W. Pink 

It may appear to some of our readers that the exposition we have given of John 3:16 in the chapter on "Difficulties and Objections" is a forced and unnatural one, inasmuch as our definition of the term "world" seems to be out of harmony with the meaning and scope of this word in other passages, where, to supply the world of believers (God’s elect) as a definition of "world" would make no sense. Many have said to us, "Surely, ‘world’ means world, that is, you, me, and everybody." In reply we would say: We know from experience how difficult it is to set aside the "traditions of men" and come to a passage which we have heard explained in a certain way scores of times, and study it carefully for ourselves without bias Nevertheless, this is essential if we would learn the mind of God. 

Many people suppose they already know the simple meaning of John 3:16, and therefore they conclude that no diligent study is required of them to discover the precise teaching of this verse. Needless to say, such an attitude shuts out any further light which they otherwise might obtain on the passage. Yet, if anyone will take a Concordance and read carefully the various passages in which the term "world" (as a translation of "kosmos") occurs, he will quickly perceive that to ascertain the precise meaning of, the word "world" in any given passage is not nearly so easy as is popularly supposed. 

The word "kosmos," and its English equivalent "world," is not used with a uniform significance in the New Testament. Very far from it. It is used in quite a number of different ways. Below we will refer to a few passages where this term occurs, suggesting a tentative definition in each case: 

"Kosmos" is used of the Universe as a whole: Acts 17: 24 - "God that made the world and all things therein seeing that He is Lord of heaven and earth." is used of the Universe as a whole: Acts 17: 24 - "God that made the world and all things therein seeing that He is Lord of heaven and earth." 

"Kosmos" is used of the earth: John 13:1; Eph. 1:4, etc., etc.- "When Jesus knew that his hour was come that He should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved His own which were in the world He loved them unto the end." "Depart out of this world" signifies, leave this earth. "According as He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world." This expression signifies, before the earth was founded—compare Job 38:4 etc. 

"Kosmos" is used of the world-system: John 12:31 etc. "Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the Prince of this world be cast out"— compare Matt. 4:8 and I John 5:19, R. V.

"Kosmos" is used of the whole human race: Rom. 3: 19, etc.—"Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God." 

"Kosmos" is used of humanity minus believers: John 15:18; Rom. 3:6 "If the world hate you, ye know that it hated Me before it hated you." Believers do not "hate" Christ, so that "the world" here must signify the world of unbelievers in contrast from believers who love Christ. "God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world." Here is another passage where "the world" cannot mean "you, me, and everybody," for believers will not be "judged" by God, see John 5:24. So that here, too, it must be the world of unbelievers which is in view. is used of humanity minus believers: John 15:18; Rom. 3:6 "If the world hate you, ye know that it hated Me before it hated you." Believers do not "hate" Christ, so that "the world" here must signify the world of unbelievers in contrast from believers who love Christ. "God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world." Here is another passage where "the world" cannot mean "you, me, and everybody," for believers will not be "judged" by God, see John 5:24. So that here, too, it must be the world of unbelievers which is in view. 

"Kosmos" is used of Gentiles in contrast from Jews: Rom. 11:12 etc. "Now if the fall of them (Israel) be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them (Israel) the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their (Israel’s) fulness." Note how the first clause in italics is defined by the latter clause placed in italics. Here, again, "the world" cannot signify all humanity for it excludes Israel! 

"Kosmos" is used of believers only: John 1:29; 3:16, 17; 6:33; 12;47; I Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19. We leave our readers to turn to these passages, asking them to note, carefully, exactly what is said and predicated of "the world" in each place. is used of believers only: John 1:29; 3:16, 17; 6:33; 12;47; I Cor. 4:9; 2 Cor. 5:19. We leave our readers to turn to these passages, asking them to note, carefully, exactly what is said and predicated of "the world" in each place. 

Thus it will be seen that "kosmos" has at least seven clearly defined different meanings in the New Testament. It may be asked, Has then God used a word thus to confuse and confound those who read the Scriptures? We answer, No! nor has He written His Word for lazy people who are too dilatory, or too busy with the things of this world, or, like Martha, so much occupied with "serving," they have no time and no heart to "search" and "study" Holy Writ! 

Should it be asked further, But how is a searcher of the Scriptures to know which of the above meanings the term "world" has in any given passage? The answer is: This may be ascertained by a careful study of the context, by diligently noting what is predicated of "the world" in each passage, and by prayer fully consulting other parallel passages to the one being studied. 

The principal subject of John 3:16 is Christ as the Gift of God. The first clause tells us what moved God to "give" His only begotten Son, and that was His great "love;" the second clause informs us for whom God "gave" His Son, and that is for, "whosoever (or, better, ‘every one’) believeth;" while the last clause makes known why God "gave" His Son (His purpose), and that is, that everyone that believeth "should not perish but have everlasting life." 

That "the world" in John 3:16 refers to the world of believers (God’s elect), in contradistinction from "the world of the ungodly" (2 Pet. 2:5), is established, unequivocally established, by a comparison of the other passages which speak of God’s "love." "God commendeth His love toward US"—the saints, Rom. 5:8. "Whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth"—every son, Heb. 12:6. "We love Him, because He first loved US"—believers, I John 4:19. 

The wicked God "pities" (see Matt. 18:33). Unto the unthankful and evil God is "kind" (see Luke 6:35). The vessels of wrath He endures "with much long-suffering" (see Rom. 9:22). But "His own" God "loves"!!


#universalatonement #gospel  #kosmos #john3 #world  #godslove #allworld

Theory of a well-meant offer.

 Well-Meant Offer of the Gospel

The theory of a well-meant offer, that is, God’s offer of salvation to all humans with the desire that all humans be saved, and the heresy of universal atonement are inseparably linked. If God in the preaching desires all to be saved out of a love for them all, Christ must have died for all.

 Theologians are now pressing this truth upon nominally Reformed theologians and churches that have committed themselves to the well-meant offer. The theory of a well-meant offer necessarily implies universal atonement.

The heresy is that God loves all (with a saving love–the love that gave Jesus to the cross). The misunderstanding, if such it is, and not worse, is that one can promiscuously preach Christ, draw the elect to God, and assure elect sinners of their salvation only by preaching the well-meant offer. In fact, the gospel presents Christ to all; (externally, but seriously) calls all hearers to come to Christ for salvation; and promises salvation to all who come in a true faith. To preach promiscuously “whoever believes will be saved” does not need nor does it depend upon universal atonement. Those who will believe are the elect in the audience, whom God will draw by His inner, efficacious call as the gospel is preached.

To state the issue bluntly, preaching “whoever believes will be saved” does not require, or imply, universal atonement. It requires, and implies, atonement for whomever repents and believes. And these are the elect.


#universalatonement #gospel 

The Value of the Reprobate To God


 The Value of the Reprobate To God

The reprobate have value to God as scaffolding is valuable to a builder. They are used by God as a means to help build up and support His church throughout the ages. 

For example, unbelieving (and perhaps reprobate) daughter of Pharaoh, who was used by God to take Moses out of the Nile river, and also the unbelieving (and perhaps reprobate) teachers and instructors who were used by God to raise up that young child in all kinds of earthly wisdom and knowledge, in order to bring him to the position he got to in Egypt.

It’s the same in our age and experience: God providentially raises up many unbelievers (the majority of which are reprobate) who are used by Him to build church buildings, do the electrical installations, tarmac the driveway, and set up security systems. Also, there are many unbelieving parents raise up offspring, some of which are God’s elect (some of which are even reading this article!) who later come to repentance. An unbelieving spouse also supports a believing spouse in driving them to church (even though the unbeliever hates the gospel and never goes into the building on the Lord’s Day). 

All men are valuable to God in various ways, but not all have equal value. God is sovereign in His love and mercy: 

“[He has] mercy on whom he will have mercy” (Romans 9:15).

“I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee” (Isaiah 43:3).

An illustration in nature is seen in the corn plant—the most important part being the kernel. But the kernel is sustained and supported by various things: the roots, the stem, the leaves, and the chaff—all of which are “rejected” and burned by the farmer on the day of harvesting. The farmer only has his eye on the kernels of corn or wheat, etc.   In the same way, God has His eye of grace and salvation only upon the elect in the world that He made. He loves them only and causes all things in the earthly creation to grow, mature, and revolve around them alone:

“... for no other reason does he [i.e., God] sustain the world than to collect from it the number of the elect ...” (Francis Turretin, “Institutes of Elenctic Theology,” vol. 3, p. 42).

“The reprobate are for the purpose of the elect, as scaffolding is necessary for building the temple of God (Eph. 2:20-22). Even Cyrus, ungodly king of Persia, is called God’s ‘shepherd’ in Isaiah 44:28. Though he was a reprobate, God used him to bring Judah’s captive people back to Canaan at the end of 70 years.” (Herman C. Hanko, “Covenant Reformed News,” vol. 17, no. 2 [February 2020]).

God providentially supports and sustains the existence of the reprobate in the world through various things—sunshine, rain, families, knowledge, science, inventions, etc.—but only for the purpose of using them in His greater plan that He has for His elect church.

Soli Deo Gloria!

#elect #Reprobate #sovereigntyofGod #truth #sovereigntyofGod #scripture #faith #blessed #Bible #Faith 

Is the gospel of God’s grace in Christ to be offered to all men?”

 Is the gospel of God’s grace in Christ to be offered to all men?”

gospel of God’s grace in Christ


If one would be willing to change the word offer in the question into preaching then I can readily answer in the affirmative. The word offer does not fit in that context, for grace is not offered, but given. Apart from that I would have no objection to the proposition that the preaching must be a proclamation of God’s grace in Christ. (Herman Hoeksema, "A Power of God Unto Salvation," p. 76)

This controversy is not about whether the gospel should be preached to all men and that all should be called to repentance and faith and that the promise of the gospel should be made known to all. All agree to the above, but debate is over the will and desire of God in the call of the gospel. (Lau Chin Kwee, “Protestant Reformed Theological Journal,” vol. 36, no. 1 [Nov. 2002], p. 29)

Other questions and answers 

#Gospel 

Thursday, June 23, 2022

Total Depravity

Questions on Total Depravity 

Total Depravity    

1. మనిషి ప్రాథమికంగా మంచివాడా లేక ప్రాథమికంగా చెడ్డవాడా?

Is man basically good or basically evil?


2. మనుష్యులందరూ చెడ్డవారు మరియు అవినీతిపరులా? ఏమైనా మినహాయింపులు ఉన్నాయా?

 All men are evil and corrupt? Are there any exceptions?


3. మనుషులందరూ చాలా మంచివారా?

 Are people good deep down?               


4. ప్రజలందరూ పూర్తిగా చెడిపోయారా? వ్యక్తి యొక్క ప్రతి అవయవం పాడైందా?

 Are men totally depraved? Is every faculty of the person corrupted?


5. ప్రజలందరూ తమను తాము మార్చుకోగలరా లేదా వారు కోరుకున్నప్పుడు మంచి చేయగలరా?

 Can men change themselves or still do good when they want to?


6.  కనీసం పుట్టినప్పుడు అందరూ పవిత్రులా?$

 Are men at least born pure?


7.  దేవుడు గురించి మానవుని సహజ స్వభావం ఏమిటి?

 What is the natural disposition of man toward God?


8. దేవునికి మనిషికి ఉన్న సంబంధం ఏమిటి?

 What is man’s relationship to God?


9. దేవుణ్ణి సంతోషపెట్టడానికి మనిషి ఏదైనా చేయగలడా?

 Can man then do anything to please God?


10. మనుష్యులు కనీసం దేవుణ్ణి వెతుకుతున్నారా?

 Are men at least seeking God?


11. సాధారణ మనిషి సువార్తను గ్రహించగలడా లేదా దేవుని గురించిన జ్ఞానమును తనంతట తాను తెలుసుకుని తనను తాను రక్షించుకోగలడా?

 Can the natural man comprehend the gospel or come to saving knowledge of God on his own?


12. దేవుని బహుమానమైన రక్షణను తనకు తాను అంగీకరించగలడా? మనుష్యులు దేవుణ్ణి తెలుసుకోగలడా/ఎన్నుకోగలడా లేక స్వయంగా ఆయన వద్దకు వస్తారా?

 Can men of themselves accept God’s gift of salvation? Do men choose God or come to Him on their own?


13. విశ్వాసం/నమ్మకం/పశ్చాత్తాపాన్ని ఎవరు అందిస్తారు?

 Who supplies faith/belief/repentance?


14. ప్రజలందరూ తమకు తాముగా సహాయం చేసుకోవడానికి ఏదైనా చేయగలరా?

 Can men do anything to help themselves?


15. అప్పుడు మన అతిశయాలు  ఏమవుతాయి?

 Then what becomes of our boasting?


16. మనుషులు దేవుడి చేతిలో కీలుబొమ్మలా?

 Are men mere puppets in Gods hands?


17. దేవుని దృష్టిలో నీతిమంతుడుగా  ఉన్న కనీసం ఒక నైనా లేఖనాలనుండి చూపించగలరా? లేక తన స్వంత సామర్థ్యాలతో సువార్తకు సానుకూలంగా స్పందించిన వారు ఎవరైనా ఉన్నారా?

 Can you quote from Scriptures atleast one person who is 'good' in God's expectations? or any one who positively responded to gospel with his own abilities?


ఎ) 2 పేతురు 2:5 నీతిమంతుడు మరియు నీతిని బోధించే నోవహు గురించి ఏమిటి?

18. What about Noah, who is just and preacher of righteousness 2 Pet 2:5?


బి) వినయంగా ఉండే మోషే. సంఖ్యాకాండము 12:3?

19. Moses who was humble. Numbers 12:3? 


సి) పోతీఫరు భార్య నుండి పారిపోయిన జోసెఫ్? ఆది 39:12?

20.  Joseph who ran from Potiphar's wife? Gen 39:12?


డి) ''పరిపూర్ణుడు మరియు యథార్థవంతుడు, దేవునికి భయపడి చెడును విడిచిపెట్టేవాడు'' అయిన యోబు గురించి ఎలా చెప్పాలి? యోబు 1:8

 How about Job, who is ''a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God and escheweth evil'? Job 1:8


21. "God is the Father only of those who've been born again through faith in the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ." What's the error?   Is this a correct statement?

నిత్యసంకల్పం తరువాతే భవిష్యదజ్ఞానము! ఇది తారుమారు అయితే, గందరగోళం ఏంటి?

Foreordination first and then Foreknowledge. What is the wrong view if the sequence is the other way...?

Of the prodigal, Scripture says, he came to his own senses... Does this mean man hath a free will?

Does "whosoever will" indicate man's ability?

22. “Is the gospel of God’s grace in Christ to be offered to all men?”

If one would be willing to change the word offer in the question into preaching then I can readily answer in the affirmative. The word offer does not fit in that context, for grace is not offered, but given. Apart from that I would have no objection to the proposition that the preaching must be a proclamation of God’s grace in Christ. (Herman Hoeksema, "A Power of God Unto Salvation," p. 76)

This controversy is not about whether the gospel should be preached to all men and that all should be called to repentance and faith and that the promise of the gospel should be made known to all. All agree to the above, but debate is over the will and desire of God in the call of the gospel. (Lau Chin Kwee, “Protestant Reformed Theological Journal,” vol. 36, no. 1 [Nov. 2002], p. 29).


#depravity  #TotalDepravity #ReformedTheology #paradisechurch #godslove #telugumessages #god #sin

The High Calling

 The High Calling


If God has called you to be truly like Jesus in all your spirit, He will draw you into a life of crucifixion and humility. He will put on you such demands of obedience that you will not be allowed to follow other Christians. In many ways, He seems to let other good people do things which He will not let you do.

            Others who seem to be very religious and useful may push themselves, pull wires, and scheme to carry out their plans, but you cannot. If you attempt it, you will meet with such failure and rebuke from the Lord as to make you sorely penitent.

            Others can brag about themselves, their work, their successes, their writings, but the Holy Spirit will not allow you to do any such thing. If you begin to do so, He will lead you into some deep mortification that will make you despise yourself and all your good works.

            Others will be allowed to succeed in making great sums of money, or having a legacy left to them or in having luxuries, but God may supply you only on a day to day basis, because He wants you to have something far better than gold, a helpless dependence on Him and His unseen treasury.

            The Lord may let others be honored and put forward while keeping you hidden in obscurity because He wants to produce some choice fragrant fruit for His coming glory, which can only be produced in the shade.

            God may let others be great, but keep you small. He will let others do a work for Him and get the credit, but He will make you work and toil without knowing how much you are doing.  Then, to make your work still more precious, He will let others get the credit for the work which you have done; this is to teach you the message of the Cross, humility and something of the value of being cloaked with His nature. The Holy Spirit will put a strict watch on you, and with a jealous love rebuke you for careless words and feelings, or for wasting your time which other Christians never seem distress ed over.

            So make up your mind that God is an infinite Sovereign and has a right to do as He pleases with His own, and that He may not explain to you a thousand things which may puzzle your reason in His dealings with you. God will take you at your word; if you absolutely sell yourself to be His slave, He will wrap you up in a jealous love and let other people say and do many things that you cannot. Settle it forever: you are to deal directly with the Holy Spirit, He is to have privilege of tying your tongue or chaining your hand or closing your eyes in ways in which others are not dealt with. However, know this great secret of the Kingdom: When you are so completely possessed with the Living God that you are in your secret heart, pleased and delighted over this peculiar, personal, private, jealous guardianship and management of the Holy Spirit over your life, you will have found the vestibule of heaven, the high calling of God.

 

Author known only to God.

About us

 Statement on Scripture

We believe that God has revealed Himself and His truth by both general and special revelation. General revelation displays His existence, power, providence, moral standard, patience, goodness, and glory; special revelation manifests His triune nature and His plan of redemption through Messiah for humanity. This special revelation has been given in two ways, preeminently in the incarnate Word of God—Jesus Christ, and in the inscripturated Word of God—the Bible. We affirm that the sixty-six books of the Bible are the written Word of God given by the Holy Spirit and are the complete and final canonical revelation of God for all time. (Rom. 1:18-2:4; 2:14-16; Ps. 19; Acts 14:15-17; 17:22-31; John 1:1- 18; 1 Thess. 2:13; Heb. 1:1-2; 4:12)

We believe these books were written by a process of dual authorship in which the Holy Spirit so moved the human authors that, through their individual personalities and styles, they composed and recorded God’s Word which is inerrant. These books, constituting the written Word of God, convey objective truth and are the believer’s only infallible rule of faith and practice. (2 Tim. 3:16-17; 2 Pet. 1:19-20; John 10:35; 17:17; 1 Cor. 2:10-13) 

We Believe that, whereas there may be several applications of any given passage of Scripture, there is but one true interpretation. The meaning of Scripture is to be found as one diligently applies the literal grammatical-historical method of interpretation under the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit (John 7:17; 16:12-15; 1 Cor. 2:7-15; 1 John 2:20). It is the responsibility of believers to ascertain carefully the true intent and meaning of Scripture, recognizing that proper application is binding on all generations. Yet the truth of Scripture stands in judgment of men; never do men stand in judgment of it.

Statement on the Church

We believe the Church is the elect people of God, existing from the beginning of the world and completed at the return of Christ who is its head. The mission of the Church is to glorify God by worshiping corporately, building itself up as a loving, faithful community by instruction of the Word, observing baptism and communion, embracing the doctrinal mandates of the apostles, communicating the Gospel, and making disciples of all peoples. (Matt. 16:18; 28:16-20; Acts 1:4, 5; 11:15; 2:46, 47; 1 Cor. 12:13; Rom. 12:4-21; Eph. 1:22, 23; 2:19-22; 3:4-6; 5:25-27; Col. 1:18; Rev. 5:9)

We believe Christians should gather together in local assemblies. They are priests before God and to one another, responsible to serve God and minister to each other. The biblically designated officers serving under Christ and leading the assembly are elders and deacons.

Although church and state are distinct institutions, believers are to submit to the government within the limits of God’s Word. (Matt. 18:15-18; 22:15-22; 28:19; Acts 2:41, 42; 6:1-6; 1Cor. 14:40; Eph. 4:11, 12; 1 Tim. 3:1-13; Tit. 1:5-9; Heb. 10:25; 1 Pet. 2:5-10, 13-17; 5:1-5)

THE LORDS SUPPER

1. We believe that the Lord’s Supper is the commemoration and proclamation of His death until He comes (1 Cor. 11:28-32).

2. We believe that the Lord’s Supper should be observed in the regular gathering of the church, knowing that it is one of the chief purposes of its meeting. (Acts 20:7; 1 Cor.11:18-20,33)

3. We believe in celebrating the breaking of bread followed by a fellowship meal so that we would reverentially remember the Lord’s death and also relish the fellowship of one another. (Acts 2:42,46; 1 Cor.11:20-21; Jude 12) This way, the Lord’s Supper also reflects the future marriage supper of the Lamb. (Acts 2:46; Lu. 22:28-30; Rev. 19:6-9)

4. We believe that the Lord’s Supper is to be observed by those who are officially recognized as members of our local church. Visitors to our church can partake in the breaking of bread, provided they are born-again and are committed to their local church.

5. We believe that the Lord’s Supper should be partaken in a worthy manner. When believers have interpersonal conflicts, including husband and wife, we encourage them to settle their disputes and then partake in the Lord’s Supper (1 Cor. 11:17-33). 

6. We believe that the Lord’s Supper is a reminder of church’s vertical relationship with the Lord, i.e. remembering Christ’s atonement and victory on the cross, and also of its horizontal relationship with one another, i.e. mutual fellowship and encouragement. (Acts 2:46; Luke 22:15-18,30; 1 Cor.11:26; Acts 2:42; 1 Cor.10:16) 

 7. We believe that any committed and growing believer can administer the Lord’s Supper, not necessarily a pastor.

Address:  Paradise Church,  H.No. 8-7/6/F, Naveen Residency, Road No 9, Hema Nagar, Boduppal, Ghatkesar, RR Dist. 500039

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

FOR WHOM DID CHRIST DIE?

 For WHOM did Christ die? We answer, Christ died for “God’s elect”!


“Strangest thing in the world for me is for men to contend that Christ made an effort on the Cross to save the whole world, and then turned around and said, “I pray not for the world!” – Pastor Henry Mahan


“And she shall bring forth a Son, and thou shalt call His name Jesus: for He shall save HIS people from THEIR sins [Mt. 1:21]. Christ died not simply to render sins pardonable, but “to PUT AWAY SIN by the sacrifice of Himself” [Heb. 9:26].


As to WHO’S “sin” has been “put away”, Scripture leaves us in no doubt—it was that of the elect. “For the transgressions of MY PEOPLE was He stricken [Isa. 53:8]. Again the Lord’s own words are, “I lay down My life for the SHEEP” (not the goats)! [John 10:15]


“Christ did not intend to save those He knew He would not save. If He intended to and NOT FOR THE WORLD. It was the elect that Christ came to save. Since God eternally decreed not to save others Christ would not be engaged in a FOOL’S errand.” [Jonathan Edwards]


Men’s fanciful delusion of an Unlimited Atonement is reduced to this – “IF the sinner believes, then Christ died for him; if the sinner does not believe, then Christ did not die for him; thus the sinner’s act is made the cause of its own object, as though his believing WOULD MAKE THAT TO BE WHICH OTHERWISE WAS NOT”. [A.W. Pink]

A DISCIPLINED CHRISTIAN HOME: (A W Pinks Life)

A DISCIPLINED CHRISTIAN HOME: (A W Pinks Life)

The Pinks home, besides being Christian, was very strict and disciplined, and the children were

expected to honor God in all their ways. The Sabbath was reverently observed, a practice Pink continued through out his life following his conversion. He later wrote of his early training in Sabbath observance:


“And today the writer is unfeignedly thankful to God that he was brought up in a home where the holy Sabbath was so “strictly”—scripturally—kept. The day began by our father reading to us God’s Word. In the morning the family attended preaching service. In the afternoon father and mother read to us out of spiritual books. Quite a liitle of the time was spent in the singing of the hymns…And our father was not a preacher.”


Pink says further in this comment that no business letters were ever opened in his home as a child on the Sabbath, and neither were Sunday newspapers ever allowed. Besides that, all toys were put away on Saturday night, and pictorial editions of Bunyans pilgrim progress and other spiritual books replaced them.


Pink never expressed sorrow over this early strict life and training. Rather he often spoke of this early parental and family influence with praise to God. In one instance he listed all he had to praise God for, and he included his godly parents who cared for him in infancy and trained him in the way he should go spiritually. When speaking of the story of Joseph, he said that the story was “indelibly impressed” on his memory from his mother’s knee and from the lips of his Sunday school teacher. He refers elsewhere to some lines of poetry taught to him by his mother, lines that search the heart deeply and stayed with him down through the years.


Those lines were:


I often say my prayers

But do I every pray?

And do the wishes of my heart

Go with the words I say?

I may as well kneel down 

And worship gods of stone

As offer to the living God

A prayer of words alone.


Quite obviously the Pinks took being Christians very seriously. Bible teaching in the home, strict Sabbath observance, searching honestly before God in prayer, and no doubt, full respect for the demands of Gods word in lifestyle and holiness of life. The children were expected to behave to respect their elders and to be disciplined in their lives. Failure at these points brought punishment mixed with words of admonition and rebuke. The Pinks did reared spoiled brats, as can be seen from comments made by Pink some years later as he traveled in the ministry.


“One of the saddest and most tragic features of our twentieth-century "Civilization" is the awful prevalence of disobedience on the part of children to their parents during the days of childhood, and their lack of reverence and respect when they grow up. This is evidenced in many ways, and is general, alas, even in the families of professing Christians. In his extensive travels during the past thirty years the writer has sojourned in a great many homes. The piety and beauty of some of them remain as sacred and fragrant memories, but others of them have left the most painful impressions. Children who are self-willed or spoiled, not only bring themselves into perpetual unhappiness but also inflict discomfort upon all who come into contact with them, and auger, by their conduct, evil things for the days to come.”


Though Pink and his wife never had any children, his convictions concerning the rearing of children were strong and unquestionably in line with his childhood and early training.

Menu